Sometimes it’s simply better to be lucky than good. That’s an important factor when analyzing pitchers. Isolate those who have been catching some good breaks, and it’s likely to garner an edge in determining hurlers who are likely to start heading in the other direction once their luck starts to turn.
Back in the not so good old days, there were precious few stats widely available to help arrive at these conclusions. I found BB/K ratios to be about the most reliable factor, and I would primarily focus on pitchers whose numbers were varying widely from their norm. I still rely on these ratios, but thanks to some of the phenomenally in depth statistics that are actually pretty easy to find these days, I’ve been able to expand my scope of analysis considerably.
One of the new categories that I’ve found to be of immense help is known as BABIP. This is the batting average allowed by pitchers to opposing hitters on balls that are put into play. Find a pitcher who’s yielding an unusually high BABIP and that’s a guy who’s likely to start catching a few more good breaks. Obviously, the reverse is frequently the case for pitchers sporting an unusually low BABIP.
We can use just the past couple of nights as an example of how quickly things often turn around. Heading into Tuesday night’s action, John Danks had a .149 BABIP, a clear indicator he wasn’t pitching as well as his basic stats indicated. Anthony Reyes was at .157 going into his Tuesday start. Both pitchers got trashed. Of course, it doesn’t always work out so well, but the idea here isn’t to win all the plays, just a good enough percentage to yield a profit.
On the flip side, Cole Hamels had a ridiculous .429 BABIP going into his Tuesday start. Hamels had to leave early when he sprained an ankle, but he was pitching shutout ball in the fifth inning when he got hurt. The prior night, Justin Verlander finally avoided having an absurd number of batted balls find open spaces and he dominated the Yankees.
Ideally, I like finding a pitcher with a BABIP that’s way off average in either direction, and then also seeing that this pitcher’s BB/K ratio is also far off center. When I find a pitcher that qualifies on both counts, either positively or negatively, it’s very likely to lead to game I’m going to take a strong stance on. And make no mistake, these numbers can also be used by fantasy baseball players as a guide toward plucking undervalued free agents or perhaps in working a great deal that pays off down the road.
Here’s a pitcher to consider fading in his next start. Brian Bannister has roared to a 2-0 record since being recalled by the Royals. On the surface, he would seem like a live dog for his likely Saturday hookup with Glen Perkins. The BB/K ratio and the BABIP for Bannister indicates that just isn’t the case. Bannister’s 2-0 is far more luck than skill. In 13 innings of work, Bannister has issued eight walks with just three strikeouts. While he’s not by any means a strikeout pitcher, that’s still below his norm and the walk rate, even in a small sample, is much higher than it ought to be. As for Bannister’s BABIP, it’s an amazing .122. That’s beyond lucky, it’s downright phenomenal. And what it means is that he’s about to get bombed.
It might not happen in this next start, but a Bannister blowup is coming and very soon. You can take that to the bank. Work closely with ratios such as the ones described here, and you’re likely to be making lots of positive trips to the bank.